Asics GT-2000 Running Shoe Review

August 20, 2013

In because a curveball as you are prone to receive from Asics within their award winnigest products in the last decade (the GT Series), the brand new-for-2013 GT 2000 is really a major update in title around it’s in technology. The departure in the traditional naming convention (beginning using the original GT 2000 in 1995, adding 10 towards the number every year up through the 2010 2170) can make method for a far more memorable product title: moving forward, version designations only will be distinguished with a v2, v3, v4, etc. appended towards the GT 2000 moniker.

Like a couple of brands have discovered through the years, significantly, or perhaps subtly altering your products names with every version can result in significant consumer confusion, and sometimes can alienate customers altogether. But because Nike Pegasus users of yore now can attest, the Pegasus begat the Pegasus, which begat the Pegasus, the Pegasus, and also the Pegasus, etc… Whether it’s labored for Nike for pretty much 3 decades, it’ll certainly work with the Asics workhorse.

But you are not for a primer on shoe-naming. You’d like to learn the way the shoe compares to the direct predecessor, the GT-2170, and just how it stands by itself because the bedrock from the moderate stability category. For the review, we’ll break it lower into three F’s: Function, Fit, and Feel.

The GT 2000, as with all version prior, will probably be an average stability choice for the public. Thinking about that every day, as much as 70% in our subscriber base (and as a result Asics’ constituency) includes a inclination to overpronate to some extent, the moderate stability category–individuals footwear which usually have a dual-density midsole composed of the medial publish roughly the size of the arch–signifies the huge most of shoes offered in large box and niche running merchants.

The Asics GT series continues to be, by our estimation always is going to be, the conventional through which other moderate stability footwear are measured. Though other brands could make phenomenal choices within the category Brooks, Saucony, Adidas, Mizuno, Asics and so on if you are creating a shoe, there is no way your R&D department is not first getting a GT and passing on a great whack using the SawzAll for any look at its guts.

Nevertheless, the brand new GT 2000 plays the part perfectly. Having a modest but nevertheless substantial medial publish made from Dynamic DuoMax (a denser Avoi foam than its neighboring SoLyte), the GT 2000 plays nice with slight to moderate overpronators, but fails to deliver from the motion control category with a good bit: Brooks Addiction users would discover the GT 2000 flexible, otherwise flimsy, under heavily pronating archways. Animal users do not need to apply. Note: Asics’ website indicates the shoe covers a spectrum of feet types from Neutral to Severe Overpronation, which we didn’t find to be real.

We are going up to now ourselves here, however the asics 2000 running shoes fits nearly the same as the GT-2100 (lengthy regarded as among the best versions up to now), having a narrower forefoot along with a rounder toebox compared to previous 2170. Runners with wide-ant ft will observe that a (2E) width option exists, and will also be blocking its way through our stores within the coming days. Meanwhile runners with moderate to narrow ft will discover the shoe fits positively just like a glove, having a snug foam heel (Asics calls it Personalized Heel Fit) along with a not so deep upper to create an easy, airy feeling shoe. Initial put on testing has proven models to be real to size: in which the prior model went a little shorter than normal, the GT 2000 will fit just like a running footwear should–about 1/2 to some full-sized bigger than your dress shoe size.

Typically plush, Asics midsoles and padding technologies (Gel coffee pods rear and forefront, with uncovered Gel within the heel) abound, creating an properly soft, yet springy feel underfoot. Runners having a heavy heelstrike will make use of the ample squish and decoupling within the rearfoot, and individuals having a more mid-foot-strike will understand the Gel coffee pods underneath the metatarsal heads.

In addition, the heel-foot offset drops lower a little to 21mm/11mm to permit a rather natural feet position and softer ride for runners with increased efficient form. Lastly, a split Guidance Trusstic piece (the plastic bit that bridges the heel towards the forefoot) supplies a better transition from heel to to foot whilst permitting for any slight weight savings because of removing extraneous plastic. The GT 2000 weighs in at in at 9.3oz within the sample size, something of the task for better padding and the quantity of stability the shoe offers its customers.

Runners while using GT-2170 or its cousins the Brooks GTS, Saucony Guide, and Asics 860 will discover the support plenty familiar, having a slightly better underfoot feel than years back. The re-engineering from the midsole and rethinking of padding elements creates a decidedly different feeling GT, but we’re feeling runners will adapt rapidly towards the change and can ultimately love what’s been completed to the shoe. Runners who needed the greater ample upper and wider midsole in recent GT versions will dsicover the GT 2000 a little around the snug side, however the (2E) and (D) sizes (males and ladies, correspondingly) will rapidly solve any fit issues. Lastly, the existence expectancy from the midsole is in line with prior versions, with many runners finding their footwear last between 300-400 miles, then the padding will end up suspect.

Comments on this entry are closed.